The London Economics Financial Services and Pensions team combines deep expertise in financial sector analysis with a strong track record in pensions research and policy advisory. We support public and private clients on a wide range of financial services issues – from retail and wholesale markets, regulation and consumer behaviour to pension systems, retirement saving, auto-enrolment and long-term retirement income policy. Drawing on rigorous economic and empirical methods, we deliver insights and evidence that inform policy development, regulatory strategy and business decision-making.
What we do
Our work spans the full range of financial services issues, including market functioning, regulation, consumer protection and competition. Our pensions work covers the full lifecycle of retirement saving and income, including auto-enrolment, contribution adequacy, decumulation and drawdown strategies, and the distributional and behavioural impacts of pension policy. We advise government departments, regulators, industry bodies and providers on policy design, evaluation and reform, producing analysis that informs effective policy and commercial decision-making.
How we do it
We combine rigorous economic theory with robust empirical analysis to address complex financial services and pensions questions. Our work uses advanced quantitative methods, microdata analysis, survey design and behavioural modelling. We work closely with clients to ensure our analysis is technically robust, transparent and directly relevant to real-world decision-making, translating complex evidence into insights that inform policy, regulation and commercial strategy.
We work for:
- Policy-makers and government departments
- Industry bodies and trade associations
- Regulators and supervisory authorities
- Financial institutions and pension providers
- NGOs and other not-for-profit organisations
We carry out:
- Market and sector analyses
- Competition and regulatory analysis
- Ex-ante and ex-post impact assessments
- Policy and programme analysis and evaluations
- Consumer analysis and household behaviour analysis
- Behavioural experiments and analysis of financial and retirement decision making
We advise clients on issues related to:
- The functioning of capital markets (equity markets, fixed income markets, money markets and others)
- Banking and non-bank financial institutions (including clearing and settlement and payment services)
- Credit and debt markets, including personal debt and insolvency
- Insurance markets
- Regulation of and supervision of financial institutions and competition in financial markets
- Consumer behaviour, protection and financial inclusion
- Pension system design, retirement income adequacy, and decumulation strategies
- Financial business support programmes and policies
For further information on our Behavioural Economics team, please click here.
Case studies
Examples of our work include:
Best Practices and Performance of Auto-Enrolment Mechanisms for Pension Savings
This study for the European Commission examined auto-enrolment practices, comparing them across EU and non-EU jurisdictions to make recommendations to inform any future policy action. In countries where automatic enrolment policies were well established preliminary evidence was provided on the impact of auto-enrolment on pension adequacy.
Understanding the economic impact of late payments
Late payment has long been recognised as a significant problem for businesses. However, until now, there has been a lack of methodologically robust evidence on the nature and magnitude of this problem. A recent study delivered by London Economics for the Department for Business and Trade and the Office of the Small Business Commissioner bridges this evidence gap, providing the first comprehensive analysis of the impact of late payments on UK businesses and the UK economy. The key findings of the study are that: Late payments cost the UK economy almost £11 billion per year. More than one quarter of UK businesses are affected by late payments each year. Approximately 133 million hours of staff time are spent chasing late payments each year. 14,000 businesses a year (or 38 every day) close as a direct result of late payments. The findings of the study are based on a robust methodology comprising econometric analysis of existing administrative datasets as well as a large-scale quantitative survey of UK businesses. Following the publication of the study, the UK Government has unveiled its Small Business Plan, which cracks down against late payments.
Cost of regulation of insurance brokers
London Economics recently undertook research for the British Insurance Brokers’ Association (BIBA), on the cost of regulation in the insurance sector. The analysis, based on survey data collected from insurance companies and brokers, found that regulatory costs amount to 5.2% of total premiums collected. This comprises 3.3% for insurance brokers and 1.9% for insurers, and the analysis covered personal and business products. The findings of this research highlight a significant opportunity for consumer benefits – specifically in the form of reduced premiums – by streamlining the existing regulatory regime while maintaining necessary protections.
Access to cash: Costs to consumers and SMEs of a loss of access to in-person cash and banking services
This study for the FCA estimates the costs to consumers and SMEs from loss of access to cash and in-person banking services. Our research explored how these groups currently utilise these services and, crucially, how their behaviour would change if access were withdrawn. The study identified that access to in-person services is particularly important for certain vulnerable groups, including those on low incomes and the digitally excluded. Please see the technical report through the link below.
Evaluation of the Trade Credit Reinsurance (TCR) scheme
The uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic posed serious risks to businesses and by extension to the trade credit insurance (TCI) market. To prevent the likely withdrawal of cover from the TCI market by insurers, the government launched the Trade Credit Reinsurance (TCR) Scheme. The scheme’s aim was to support UK businesses, to minimise reductions in economic activity and disruptions in supply chains, and to aid economic recovery following the pandemic. BEIS commissioned London Economics to conduct a process evaluation and interim impact evaluation of the TCR Scheme. The process evaluation assesses the effectiveness of the scheme and the processes adopted to deliver and operate the TCR Scheme, while the interim impact evaluation provides an indicative Value-for-Money (VfM) assessment and an assessment of the required quantitative data. As part of the analysis, lessons for future interventions of a similar nature were identified.
Sizing the market for non-transferable debt securities
Non-transferable debt securities (NTDSs) – also known as ‘mini-bonds’ – are unlisted bonds and debentures issued by companies directly to retail investors. Unlike listed retail bonds, mini-bonds cannot legally be sold onwards by the investor and must be held to maturity. When this study was commissioned by HM Treasury the issuance of mini-bonds was largely unregulated. In order to address the information gap on this market, London Economics was tasked with estimating the size and economic value of this market. Our study provided information on the customer’s understanding of the scale and structure of the mini-bond market in the UK, as well as how it had evolved in recent years. As part of the study, extensive consultations of financial sector experts and a range of mini-bond issuers were undertaken and the findings were cross-checked and validated against the findings from a desk-based literature review
The team
Our core team is comprised of:

Patrice Muller
Senior Managing Partner
[email protected]
+44 (0) 20 3701 7702

Carl Emmerson
Partner
[email protected]
+44 (0) 20 3701 7725
Dano Meiske
Principal Consultant
[email protected]
+44 (0) 20 3701 7697

Shaan Devnani
Associate Director
[email protected]
+44 (0) 20 3701 7709