High-Cost Short-Term Credit Price Comparison Websites – November 2015

behavioural-and-experimental-economics||114behavioural||0applying-behavioural-economics-business-industry||114competition-regulation-and-business||0consumer-and-firm-behaviour||114finance||0applying-behavioural-economics-international-institutions||114behavioural-economics-ngos-consumer-advocacy||114applying-behavioural-economics-regulators-government||114
Practice area: Behavioural and experimental economics | Behavioural Economics | Business and industry | Competition & Antitrust | Consumer and firm behaviour | Finance | International institutions | NGOs and consumer advocacy | Regulators and government
Client: Financial Conduct Authority
Published: 30 November, 2015
Keywords: quantitative analysis

This behavioural economics study for the FCA, tested additional standards for price comparison websites that compare HCSTC products. It forms part of the evidence base used by the FCA in its recommendations for additional standards in response to the CMA’s final report on payday lending.